Call for Abstracts & Awards for Excellence, Call for Nominations

Welcome to the online process for reviewing the abstracts/nominations. This online process allows you to save your work, log off and then log back in and continue your review process. However, you must save your work during each session. If you leave your workstation for a few minutes, save your work, as the system will time out and information that is not saved will be deleted.

1. Abstract Reviewers: All Abstracts must be reviewed, and decision templates completed by February 8, 2013. Contact your Ad Hoc Group Leads/admin support for your respective meeting schedule so that you can ensure that your review of the abstracts are completed before the meeting(s) to finalize the stream's program.
2. Nomination Reviewers: All nominations must be reviewed by end of day April 4, 2013. Please ensure that your reviews of the nominations are completed by this deadline in preparation to select the winners.
   
3. Log in on the upper left side of the screen using: Your username and password, which will be provided to you by the OACCAC. This is the same Review site that was used for the 2012 Conference. If you reviewed abstracts/nominations for that conference, please use the same Username and Password. If you forgot your Username, click the Contact Us tab on the left to contact Multiview. If you forgot your password, under the Login option on the left, click "Forgot your Password?" link
   
4. After Logging in, go to the right hand navigation menu titled "Process List" to see what you've been assigned to review.
   For Abstract Reviewers: Reviewers will see the abstracts that they are required to review. Ad Hoc Group Leads will see all the abstracts submitted, but are only required to evaluate the abstracts to their particular stream. Select the Process that corresponds with what Program Ad Hoc Group you are assigned to review. Please select an abstract from the list to begin.
   For Nomination Reviewers: Reviewers will see the nominations that they are required to review. Select the Processes that you have been assigned to review. Please select a nomination from the list to begin.
   
5. The first item you will see is the conflict of interest box. If a reviewer has a conflict of interest, or does not have the required knowledge to review, please select that radio button and hit "Save" and you will move on to the next submission.
6. Once you have finished scoring each section you can then "Save" the scores for the abstract/nomination. If you select "Save and Continue" the next abstract/nomination will be available for your review. If you have finished scoring all of your abstracts/nominations or need to close out your session please select "Save and Close".
7. Please remember that this review is a confidential process…so refrain from sharing with others any details of the review process or the eventual presenters/winners. We ask that you do not print them and show them to others.